Skip to content

Painful Facts and Figures About Income Taxes

Painful Facts and Figures About Income Taxes

Leer en Español

[Leer en Español]

Polls have shown time and again that Americans think the federal income tax system is “unfair.” It’s probably a safe bet that people in other countries which have income taxes are of the same opinion.

And of course, it is unfair. How could it possibly be otherwise? Politicians are constantly revising rates and deductions and creating loopholes as paybacks for friends. The tax-collecting bureaucracy snoops into people’s private lives and imposes exasperating paperwork on every citizen.

America’s experience with the federal income tax confirms the prophetic wisdom of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall almost two centuries ago: “The power to tax involves the power to destroy.” Remember that when you fill out your next tax form, no matter what state or country you live in.

Americans were given fair warning more than a century ago that the income tax would become a monster. Guess who made these remarkably radical statements about the very idea of a federal income tax?

“…an abhorrent and calamitous monstrosity. . . . It punishes everyone who rises above the rank of mediocrity. The fewer additional yokes put around the necks of the people, the better.”

“…a vicious, inequitable, unpopular, impolitic, and socialistic act. . . . the most unreasoning and un-American movement in the politics of the last quarter-century.”

“[It] can only be collected by prying into the private affairs of the people by arbitrary methods hateful to the citizens of the republic.”

Those were the words of the Washington Post, The New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune respectively, commenting in 1894 on the first income tax since the Civil War to be passed by Congress. This vitriolic criticism was aimed at a proposal to levy a mere 2 percent tax on income in excess of $4,000—which would be at least $90,000 in today’s dollars. Because of that large $4,000 exemption, 98 percent of Americans were completely exempt from income taxation.

One year later the Supreme Court ruled this tax to be unconstitutional, and so ended America’s first peacetime experiment with an income tax. It would take a constitutional amendment—the 16th, passed in 1913—to give Congress the legal power to shackle us with another one.

In 1909, when the 16th Amendment was being debated, The New York Times criticized it, saying, “When men get in the habit of helping themselves to the property of others, they cannot be easily cured of it.” History has proven that prediction to be correct (and applicable to every part of the world) though I doubt that it bothers the “progressive” New York Times as much today as it did in 1909.

After the 16th Amendment was ratified, an income tax was imposed starting in 1913. Rates ranged from 1 percent to 7 percent. The top rate applied only to incomes of more than $500,000. Married couples were only taxed on income over $4,000. In his fascinating essay, The Progressive Income Tax in U.S. History, Burton Folsom revealed a cynical side of the pro-tax crowd: “During the tax debate, William Shelton, a Georgian, supported the income tax ‘because none of us here have $4,000 incomes, and somebody else will have to pay the tax.” 

By 1916 that top rate had risen to 15 percent, on income of more than $2,000,000. Before Woodrow Wilson left office in 1921, it was more than 70 percent. Presidents Harding and Coolidge brought it back down to 24 percent but then Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt jacked it back up again. The top rate exceeded 90 percent at its peak in the early 1950s.

Franklin Roosevelt, by the way, had campaigned against Herbert Hoover in 1932 on a tax reduction platform, even calling for a 25 percent reduction in federal expenditures. He declared that Hoover had presided over “the greatest taxing and spending administration” in American history, before setting new records in both categories himself. He even imposed by executive order a 100% rate on all incomes over $25,000! (See Great Myths of the Great Depression).

The first 1040 (personal income tax) form—instructions and all—took up only four pages. Here’s what it looked like. Today, there are thousands of pages of tax forms and instructions. American workers and businesses are forced to spend billions of man-hours every year figuring out their taxes. The tax code is virtually incomprehensible, massively inefficient, hugely burdensome, and cynically corrupt.

In other words, it’s everything that the Washington Post, The New York Times, and the Chicago Tribune said a century ago that it would become.

It has been said that income taxes are the price we pay for civilization. To that, as I try to make sense of the tax code, I must ask, “This is civilization?”

For additional information, see:

War-Time Origins of Modern Income Tax Withholding by Robert Higgs

The Progressive Income Tax in U.S. History by Burton Folsom

Lawrence writes a weekly op-ed for El American. He is President Emeritus of the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) in Atlanta, Georgia; and is the author of “Real heroes: inspiring true stories of courage, character, and conviction“ and the best-seller “Was Jesus a Socialist?“ //
Lawrence escribe un artículo de opinión semanal para El American. Es presidente emérito de la Foundation for Economic Education (FEE) en Atlanta, Georgia; y es el autor de “Héroes reales: inspirando historias reales de coraje, carácter y convicción” y el best-seller “¿Fue Jesús un socialista?”

2 thoughts on “Painful Facts and Figures About Income Taxes”

  1. Any form of plunder (tax law) by any level of government in the U.S. confiscates income and property of successful people, but not the bums, sloven, and other losers. And, of course, that is logical since unsuccessful people have earned (acquired) nothing of value to tax, nor support the Nation.
    Most economists should agree that a “good” tax is one that doesn’t discourage a) production, b) labor, c) risk taking, and/or adversely impact well being. The cry for a fair tax is economically ignorant and has resulted in current federal income taxes that contradict all of the above ( a-c) “doesn’ts”! Currently, it is not fair that the U.S. Federal Personal Income tax collects more than half of its total $’s from just 5% of the population– but, almost half of the filers PAY NOTHING. THAT’S NOT FAIR.
    In each of the past few years, even though I am a PhD educated professor of economics and finance, I have been forced to annually spend between 65-90 hours preparing my relatively simple personal tax return to be in compliance of the thousands of pages of rules to determine my liability for the IRS’s pound of flesh. Some of my colleagues claim that they spend even more time at the compliance tasks . That is not fair.
    Since there is little likelihood that the miscreants in Congress will eliminate the Personal Federal Income tax, there needs to be a better way for those rascals to plunder enough from the population to pay for their questionable spending, not waste so much of my time, and be “fair.”

    My modest proposal is to have a “flat rate tax” with a substantial standard exemption, that would be simple to complete each year by just listing all income, subtract $25K, and send a check for the balance–all on one 8.5 x 11 inch page. That would raise enough $’s to properly fund the Needs of the Nation, but not most of the “wants,” and eliminates all of the current “carve-outs.”
    I’m thinking everyone or family that files should get the first $25,000 of all income (wages, capital gains, welfare, unemployment, interest, dividends, etc.) without any payment to the IRS. Then, every $ after that should be taxed at about 17%. That’s it. THAT IS FAIR. That’s my modest proposal.

    The savings in time to prepare the return would be enough to generate a 5-10% increase in the GDP, and there would not be any need for the waste of Congressional time with those guys in DC who beg Congress for “special benefits” for the group those nasty lobbyists represent.
    In the alternative, EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE “DECALS” ON THEIR OUTER JACKETS/BLOUSES IDENTIFYING THE ORGANIZATION (lobbyist) THAT GIVE THEM MONEY TO CAMPAIGN FOR VOTES…. Just like race car drivers and golfers and now college athletes who will have sponsors.

Leave a Reply