It’s Not Below My Line

Underestimating China’s will to destroy everything we hold dear (from human rights to the rule of law) is the left’s most threatening negligence.

Earlier this week, Silicon Valley billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya sparked fury on the Twittersphere by stating “nobody cares about what’s happening to the Uyghurs […] of all the things that I care about, it is below my line.”

Palihapitiya’s words and immense lack of empathy don’t show, as some have suggested, how indifferent “the 1%” is to human misery. Rather, the venture capitalist, who also happens to be a major Democratic donor, depicts with painful degree of precision one of the main problems with tech titans and numerous far-left activists: underestimating China as a real, tangible threat. 

We get it, guys: most of your production plants are not just in China, they’re precisely in Xinjiang (even you, Elon, opened a showroom there, and I’ve fought back to back alongside your side in most of your battles). But when “selfless” activists defend Palihapitiya’s indisputable cruelty just because he has called for “more women in tech” and made vague statements about America’s flaws, they feed and fatten the one power that can come for everything they hold—or should hold—dear, such as our basic freedoms. Because concentration camps, such as the ones Uyghurs are thrown in, are a huge red flag when it comes to human rights violations. 

Here at El American, we disagree on many things. These disagreements might sometimes even be noticed in our newsletters, actually, in which editors, as myself, “go rogue” and speak from our personal points of view. However, and let me be clear on this one: the Uyghur genocide is not below our line.  At El American, we care.

Previous Article

Psaki Makes Misleading Claim Over Florida and School Openings

Next Article
Demócrata, El American

28 Democrats Have Dropped Out From Midterm Elections

Related Posts

America’s Governor

As the world begins to finally overcome this tragic episode, Ron DeSantis is one of the few politicians to come out victorious. Could he be the future of the Republican Party and conservatism in the United States?